Discussion:
Promoting fcitx5 to Factory
Shung-Hsi Yu
2021-04-07 08:47:16 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Fcitx 5 has been in the M17N project for more than a year now, and it has an
5.0.0 release in November last year. Perhaps it's time to promote it into
the Factory, co-existing with Fcitx 4?

My personal experience spanning over 2 weeks is that fcitx5 seems to be the
only IME that works consistently on Sway (a Wayland window manager, also). IBus
falls a bit short when used with Firefox and Telegram Desktop. Having fcitx5
in Factory would make Sway users' live a bit easier by making it available
without an extra `zypper addrepo ...` step.


Best,
Shung-Hsi
Fuminobu TAKEYAMA
2021-04-11 11:29:52 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

@Marguerite

Do you have any plan about this?
Post by Shung-Hsi Yu
Hi,
Fcitx 5 has been in the M17N project for more than a year now, and it has an
5.0.0 release in November last year. Perhaps it's time to promote it into
the Factory, co-existing with Fcitx 4?
My personal experience spanning over 2 weeks is that fcitx5 seems to be the
only IME that works consistently on Sway (a Wayland window manager, also). IBus
falls a bit short when used with Firefox and Telegram Desktop. Having fcitx5
in Factory would make Sway users' live a bit easier by making it available
without an extra `zypper addrepo ...` step.
Best,
Shung-Hsi
Marguerite Su
2021-04-21 05:40:31 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Fcitx5 is considered stable.

And I have plan to replace fcitx4 with fcitx5 in Tumbleweed, not keep them
both.

I was about to test the fcitx4 -> fcitx5 upgrade in a clean installation...
but I don’t have time right now
Post by Fuminobu TAKEYAMA
Hi,
@Marguerite
Do you have any plan about this?
Post by Shung-Hsi Yu
Hi,
Fcitx 5 has been in the M17N project for more than a year now, and it
has an
Post by Shung-Hsi Yu
5.0.0 release in November last year. Perhaps it's time to promote it into
the Factory, co-existing with Fcitx 4?
My personal experience spanning over 2 weeks is that fcitx5 seems to be
the
Post by Shung-Hsi Yu
only IME that works consistently on Sway (a Wayland window manager,
also). IBus
Post by Shung-Hsi Yu
falls a bit short when used with Firefox and Telegram Desktop. Having
fcitx5
Post by Shung-Hsi Yu
in Factory would make Sway users' live a bit easier by making it
available
Post by Shung-Hsi Yu
without an extra `zypper addrepo ...` step.
Best,
Shung-Hsi
Weng Xuetian
2021-04-22 20:37:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Marguerite Su
Hi,
Fcitx5 is considered stable.
And I have plan to replace fcitx4 with fcitx5 in Tumbleweed, not keep them
both.
I was about to test the fcitx4 -> fcitx5 upgrade in a clean
installation... but I don’t have time right now
Please let me know if you have any concerns regarding the migration or
anything new you want me to add.

Right now data is not automatically migrated and I added a gui tool to
migrate over the data. This can get some more love to make the transition
smoother.
Marguerite Su
2021-04-23 02:00:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Weng Xuetian
Post by Marguerite Su
Hi,
Fcitx5 is considered stable.
And I have plan to replace fcitx4 with fcitx5 in Tumbleweed, not keep
them both.
I was about to test the fcitx4 -> fcitx5 upgrade in a clean
installation... but I don’t have time right now
Please let me know if you have any concerns regarding the migration or
anything new you want me to add.
Currently I just find fcitx5 has no Chinese quwei method...but nobody still
use it in 202X.

Right now data is not automatically migrated and I added a gui tool to
Post by Weng Xuetian
migrate over the data. This can get some more love to make the transition
smoother.
I think I can write some simple codes to do the data migration in the
background. because rpm %post does no support GUI.
Takashi Iwai
2021-04-23 08:29:00 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 04:00:51 +0200,
Post by Weng Xuetian
Right now data is not automatically migrated and I added a gui tool to
migrate over the data. This can get some more love to make the transition
smoother.
I think I can write some simple codes to do the data migration in the
background. because rpm %post does no support GUI. 
Well, it's not only about GUI, but in general, rpm cannot (shouldn't)
modify the data in $HOME at the package installation / upgrade. This
has to be fiddled in user level.

Loading...